Search Results

Short answer: FortressAI is Cyber Crucible's generative-AI data protection product. It enforces policy at the operating system's deepest layer, checking data access on the device and blocking, redacting, or safely allowing information before it can reach ChatG...

Short answer: Shadow AI is employees using AI tools that IT hasn't approved or doesn't know about. The risk isn't limited to rank-and-file staff — privileged administrators and compromised accounts are often the larger exposure. Three sources of exposure Empl...

Short answer: Each addresses part of the problem from the wrong layer. DLP can be bypassed, AI firewalls sit at the network edge and are blind to activity on the device, and private LLMs are expensive while doing nothing about employees using public tools anyw...

Beta capability. Browser-based AI usage detection and enforcement is currently in beta. It is functional and in active use, but evaluate it in your environment before depending on it as a control. Short answer: FortressAI monitors browser activity from the k...

Short answer: Before granting any AI tool access to data, FortressAI assesses whether that tool has been tampered with — checking the integrity of its process and loaded libraries through the same memory behavioral analytics the rest of the platform runs on. A...

Short answer: Yes. FortressAI provides per-tool assessment — granular control over exactly which AI tools are authorized and which are blocked — and location-based enforcement, so policy can be tied to where sensitive data lives rather than to individual appli...

Short answer: Core kernel-level enforcement — blocking sensitive data from reaching AI tools, per-tool authorization, and location-based data policy — is generally available. Browser-based AI usage detection and enforcement, Microsoft Purview/MIP sensitivity l...

Short answer: FortressAI prevents the leak rather than reporting it afterward, and provides straightforward records of who accessed what and where leaks were stopped — evidence you can show an auditor. Prevention as a compliance posture Most compliance exposur...

Short answer: Generally no. When an attack is stopped before execution and no data is accessed, altered, or exfiltrated, there is typically no breach to disclose. Disclosure obligations are usually triggered by unauthorized access to protected data — not by an...

Short answer: All analysis happens locally at the kernel level, so protected health information never leaves the endpoint for security processing. That avoids the HIPAA exposure created by security tools that upload sensitive files or keys to third-party cloud...

Short answer: FortressAI checks data access on the device, so student records and family data can't reach a public AI tool by accident. Cyber Crucible stops ransomware autonomously without requiring a 24/7 security operations center — which most districts and ...

Short answer: Your data stays where you put it. Analysis and enforcement happen on the endpoint, and Cyber Crucible can be deployed fully on-premises — running in physically secured server racks rather than a public cloud, with no third-party platforms, no ext...

Short answer: Storing encryption keys centrally creates a single point of failure, a high-value target, and exposure to compelled disclosure. Cyber Crucible's prevention approach doesn't depend on capturing or escrowing keys, so there is no central key store t...

Short answer: Prevention changes what you report. Instead of documenting incidents, downtime, and remediation costs, you report attacks that were stopped with no business interruption, no disclosure, and no ransom paid. What the board actually cares about In t...

Short answer: It runs entirely on the endpoint with no cloud dependency, so it protects operational technology and industrial control systems that are offline, air-gapped, or intermittently connected — and it suspends only the malicious process, so production ...

Short answer: It stops infostealers and session-token theft at the kernel level, before exfiltration begins, and it analyzes everything locally so keys and tokens never have to be uploaded to a third-party cloud. The threat financial firms actually face Hyper-...

Short answer: Through complete data sovereignty — fully on-premises installation in physically secured racks, air-gapped operation, and multi-tenant architecture — with no public cloud, no third-party SOC, and no data sharing. Sovereignty by architecture For o...

Short answer: Yes, and it has. In a maritime deployment, Cyber Crucible operated autonomously across multi-day voyages with no IT staff aboard, adapting to low-bandwidth satellite links and long disconnected stretches while protecting everything from passenger...